Elizabeth I (1558 - 1603) Read about
Elizabeth I
**** An indication as to the
way the market has moved over the last few years for Elizabeth 1st
coinage. ****
“85% of Mestrelle’s meagre experimental machine-made
coins were sixpences dated 1562.
This leaves 15% for all the other Screw-Pressed
sixpences, shillings, groats, threepences, halfgroats, threefarthings and the
gold coinage.”
Sixpences
WTH-8007: 1561 Elizabeth 1st Milled
or Machine-Pressed Silver Sixpence.
"Milled" coinage, initial mark Star, dated 1561, this being
the very first dated
Ex John Newman (his
ticket)
WTH-7457: 1564/2 Elizabeth 1st MILLED
or MACHINE PRESSED Silver Sixpence. Milled issue, initial mark Star,
Spink 2598, Borden & Brown 33 02 R1.
A rare example of an overdate in the milled series. When you consider that “85% of Mestrelle’s meagre
experimental machine-made coins were sixpences dated 1562. This leaves 15% for all the other
Screw-Pressed sixpences, shillings, groats, threepences, halfgroats, threefarthings
and the gold coinage”, you gain an insight into just how rare
all non 1562 milled coins are. I don't
tend to buy 1562 machine pressed sixpences as they are invariably
overpriced. Queen Elizabeth 1st
herself visited both mints (Upper & Lower Houses) upon the occasion of the
near completion of the recoinage on
WTH-7834: 1564/3
Elizabeth 1st MILLED or MACHINE PRESSED Silver Sixpence. Initial
mark Star, bust D, Spink 2598. A
rare example of an overdate in the milled series. When you consider that “85% of Mestrelle’s meagre
experimental machine-made coins were sixpences dated 1562. This leaves 15% for all the other
Screw-Pressed sixpences, shillings, groats, threepences, halfgroats, threefarthings
and the gold coinage”, you gain an insight into just how rare
all non 1562 milled coins are. I don't
tend to buy 1562 machine pressed sixpences as they are invariably
overpriced. Queen Elizabeth 1st
herself visited both mints (Upper & Lower Houses) upon the occasion of the
near completion of the recoinage on
WTH-7835: 1567 Elizabeth
1st MILLED or MACHINE PRESSED Silver Sixpence. Initial mark Lis, Spink 2599. A
rare example of an overdate in the milled series. When you consider that “85% of Mestrelle’s meagre
experimental machine-made coins were sixpences dated 1562. This leaves 15% for all the other
Screw-Pressed sixpences, shillings, groats, threepences, halfgroats, threefarthings
and the gold coinage”, you gain an insight into just how rare
all non 1562 milled coins are. I don't
tend to buy 1562 machine pressed sixpences as they are invariably
overpriced. Queen Elizabeth 1st
herself visited both mints (Upper & Lower Houses) upon the occasion of the
near completion of the recoinage on
WTH-7907:
1567 Elizabeth 1st MILLED
or MACHINE PRESSED Silver Sixpence. Initial mark Lis, Spink 2599.
When you consider that “85% of Mestrelle’s meagre
experimental machine-made coins were sixpences dated 1562. This leaves 15% for all the other
Screw-Pressed sixpences, shillings, groats, threepences, halfgroats, threefarthings
and the gold coinage”, you gain an insight into just how rare all
non 1562 milled coins are. I don't tend
to buy 1562 machine pressed sixpences as they are invariably overpriced. Queen Elizabeth 1st herself
visited both mints (Upper & Lower Houses) upon the occasion of the near
completion of the recoinage on
WTH-7882:
1567 Elizabeth
1st Milled or Machine-Pressed Silver Sixpence with Excellent Provenance. Initial mark lis, small crude bust, Spink
2599. Borden & Brown 37 (O1/R1) -
type 7c. The following, which I
highlight at the top of the Elizabeth 1st page, is fact: “85% of Mestrelle’s meagre experimental machine-made
coins were sixpences dated 1562. This
leaves 15% for all the other Screw-Pressed sixpences, shillings, groats,
threepences, halfgroats, threefarthings and the gold coinage.” It doesn’t take a statistician to see that
for Spink to state that a 1567 milled 6d is commoner than a 1562 6d is beyond
ridiculous (I don't tend to buy 1562 machine pressed sixpences as they are
invariably overpriced). Queen Elizabeth
1st herself visited both mints (Upper & Lower Houses) upon the
occasion of the near completion of the recoinage on
WTH-7883:
1567 Elizabeth
1st Milled or Machine-Pressed Silver Sixpence with Excellent Provenance. Initial mark lis, small crude bust, Spink
2599. Borden & Brown 37 (O1/R1) -
type 7c. The following, which I
highlight at the top of the Elizabeth 1st page, is fact: “85% of Mestrelle’s meagre experimental machine-made
coins were sixpences dated 1562. This
leaves 15% for all the other Screw-Pressed sixpences, shillings, groats,
threepences, halfgroats, threefarthings and the gold coinage.” It doesn’t take a statistician to see that
for Spink to state that a 1567 milled 6d is commoner than a 1562 6d is beyond
ridiculous. (I don't tend to buy 1562
machine pressed sixpences as they are invariably overpriced). Queen Elizabeth 1st herself
visited both mints (Upper & Lower Houses) upon the occasion of the near
completion of the recoinage on
WTH-7836: 1568/7
Elizabeth 1st MILLED or MACHINE PRESSED Silver Sixpence. Initial
mark Lis, Spink 2599. A
rare example of an overdate in the milled series. When you consider that “85% of Mestrelle’s meagre
experimental machine-made coins were sixpences dated 1562. This leaves 15% for all the other
Screw-Pressed sixpences, shillings, groats, threepences, halfgroats, threefarthings
and the gold coinage”, you gain an insight into just how rare
all non 1562 milled coins are. I don't
tend to buy 1562 machine pressed sixpences as they are invariably
overpriced. Queen Elizabeth 1st
herself visited both mints (Upper & Lower Houses) upon the occasion of the
near completion of the recoinage on
WTH-7837: 1568/7
Elizabeth 1st MILLED or MACHINE PRESSED Silver Sixpence. Initial
mark Lis, Spink 2599. A
rare example of an overdate in the milled series. When you consider that “85% of Mestrelle’s meagre
experimental machine-made coins were sixpences dated 1562. This leaves 15% for all the other
Screw-Pressed sixpences, shillings, groats, threepences, halfgroats, threefarthings
and the gold coinage”, you gain an insight into just how rare
all non 1562 milled coins are. I don't
tend to buy 1562 machine pressed sixpences as they are invariably
overpriced. Queen Elizabeth 1st
herself visited both mints (Upper & Lower Houses) upon the occasion of the
near completion of the recoinage on
WTH-7648:
1568/7 Elizabeth 1st MILLED
or MACHINE PRESSED Silver Sixpence. Small bust with ear showing,
initial mark Lis, Spink 2599. A much
rarer year although I’ve just, for the very first time, noticed that Spink rate
1568 as commoner than 1562!! Now Spink’s
price guide has many strange anomalies riddled throughout (I’m being
diplomatic!) but I have to say, this one may well take the biscuit! I don’t take too much notice of Spink pricing
as it’s all very general, based on the commonest variety (ie there are more
than x10 different varieties for 1651 Commonwealth shillings but Spink only
give one price, which will be for the very commonest of those date varieties)
and nearly always priced too low, which is probably why I’ve never noticed this
62 v’s 68 thing before. It should always
be remembered that Spink is just a guide, not a set-in-stone-bible,
although the differentials between varieties should be reasonably accurate, which
is definitely NOT the case here.
The following, which I highlight at the top of the Elizabeth 1st
page, is fact: “85% of Mestrelle’s meagre
experimental machine-made coins were sixpences dated 1562. This leaves 15% for all the other
Screw-Pressed sixpences, shillings, groats, threepences, halfgroats,
threefarthings and the gold coinage.” It doesn’t take a statistician to see that
for Spink to state that a 1568 milled 6d is commoner than a 1562 6d is beyond
ridiculous. (I don't tend to buy 1562
machine pressed sixpences as they are invariably overpriced). Queen Elizabeth 1st herself
visited both mints (Upper & Lower Houses) upon the occasion of the near
completion of the recoinage on
WTH-7801:
1568/7 Elizabeth
1st Machine Screw-Press Silver Sixpence. Small bust with ear showing, initial mark
Lis, Spink 2599. A much rarer year
although I’ve just, for the very first time, noticed that Spink rate 1568 as
commoner than 1562!! Now Spink’s price
guide has many strange anomalies riddled throughout (I’m being diplomatic!) but
I have to say, this one may well take the biscuit! I don’t take too much notice of Spink pricing
as it’s all very general, based on the commonest variety (ie there are more
than x10 different varieties for 1651 Commonwealth shillings but Spink only
give one price, which will be for the very commonest of those date varieties)
and nearly always priced too low, which is probably why I’ve never noticed this
62 v’s 68 thing before. It should always
be remembered that Spink is just a guide, not a set-in-stone-bible,
although the differentials between varieties should be reasonably accurate, which
is definitely NOT the case here.
The following, which I highlight at the top of the Elizabeth 1st
page, is fact: “85% of Mestrelle’s meagre
experimental machine-made coins were sixpences dated 1562. This leaves 15% for all the other
Screw-Pressed sixpences, shillings, groats, threepences, halfgroats,
threefarthings and the gold coinage.” It doesn’t take a statistician to see that
for Spink to state that a 1568 milled 6d is commoner than a 1562 6d is beyond
ridiculous. (I don't tend to buy 1562
machine pressed sixpences as they are invariably overpriced). Queen Elizabeth 1st herself
visited both mints (Upper & Lower Houses) upon the occasion of the near completion
of the recoinage on
Halfcrowns
WTH-7690:
1601 Elizabeth 1st
Hammered Silver Halfcrown. Seventh
issue, Spink 2583. The Edward VI crowns
and halfcrowns – primarily just eye-catching big coins to promote Edward’s
restoration of the sterling standard (after Henry VIII’s escapades) in 1551 –
didn’t really take off. The German
thaler, which was introduced actually before Elizabeth 1st was even
born, and the Spanish dollar or piece of eight, was brought to the attention of
the English mint towards the very end of the reign as a bullion coin for use
with the East India Company. Prior to
1600, the company had used foreign coinage and then the testern or Portcullis
pieces for transportation of bullion, neither of which were well received by
the monarchy, particularly the latter as it did not bear the queen’s
portrait. The large flans of these new
crowns and halfcrowns were ideal for the engraver Charles Anthony to display
his ionic portrait which pleased the queen enormously compared to the non
portrait testerns. This was either luck
or great foresight as within 50 years, the halfcrown was the principle
circulating coin in the English economy!
An interesting die variation with the sceptre pointing to the I of
Shillings
WTH-8991: Very Rare Elizabeth 1st
Hammered Silver FIRST ISSUE Shilling.
Wire inner circles only, bust 1B (Brown bust 2), initial mark Lis:
Provenance:
Ex
Herbert Muspratt Lingford collection (purchased March 1949)
Ex
Chris Comber collection
Ex
Tim Owen
WTH-7471: 1594-96 Elizabeth 1st Hammered Silver Shilling. Sixth Issue, initial mark Woolpack, Spink 2577. Bust 6B. Scratches to the face (deliberate, contemporary graffiti) otherwise a good, solid example of a scarcer denomination. £325
WTH-7905:
Elizabeth 1st
Early Hammered Silver Shilling. Initial mark Cross Crosslet,
bust 3C, second issue, Spink 2555. Second
issue Cross Crosslet hammered shillings were only struck for a total of 10
months (1st
December 1560 to 24th October 1561) – interestingly, there was a 20
odd year hiatus before shillings were once again issued under Elizabeth 1st. Minimal wear on this coin - shillings upwards
were extremely hard to prepare dies for.
The legends bit was relatively easy but to cut a die with a view to
getting a portrait onto a large piece of silver, using the hammering process,
what a remarkably difficult undertaking and one that perhaps defeated the die
sinkers most of the time. £445
Sixpences
WTH-7456: 156Z/1 Elizabeth 1st
Hammered Silver Sixpence. Third & Fourth issues, initial
mark Pheon, Spink 2561. 1562 as a date
represents a frequency of 1.8% for the 2,716 recorded single finds of Elizabeth
1st coins and 1.4% for all 5,588 recorded Elizabeth 1st hoard coins. 1562 is the nineteenth rarest of all forty
two dates. An interesting die. You might be thinking this was an error (a Z
for a 2) but you’d be wrong. 1561 was a
huge year for sixpence output, there being x17 different dies in use with
several more prepared in case they needed them.
They didn’t and so when 1562 happened, one or two of those x17 dies that
hadn’t broken were recycled, along with the unused 1561 “reserve” dies. They decided a Z made a better number 2 until
they saw sense. There are fewer 156Z/1
dies recorded than straight 62 dies.
£265
WTH-7831: 1563/2 Elizabeth 1st
Hammered Silver Sixpence. Initial mark Pheon,
third & fourth issue. Spink 2561. This
date only ever occurs as an overdate - they clearly had a lot of functional
dies left over from 1562 which they adapted / recycled to make 1563 dies. An unusual triple vertical
dot arrangement after
WTH-8116: 1563/2 Elizabeth 1st Tudor
Hammered Silver Sixpence. Initial mark Pheon, third & fourth
issue. Spink 2561. This date only ever occurs as an
overdate - they clearly had a lot of functional dies left over from 1562 which
they adapted / recycled to make 1563 dies.
An unusual triple vertical dot arrangement after
WTH-7459: 1564 Elizabeth 1st Hammered
Silver Sixpence. Third & Fourth issues, initial
mark Pheon, Spink 2561b. 1564 (all
varieties) as a date represents a frequency of 2.2% for the 2,716 recorded
single finds of Elizabeth 1st coins and 1.8% for all 5,588 recorded Elizabeth
1st hoard coins, but you also need to be aware that there are x14
recorded examples of all 1564 dies and ONLY ONE OF THOSE IS A
STRAIGHT 64!! This is a very
rare coin and hugely underrated by most people.
£245
WTH-7460: 1565 Elizabeth 1st
Hammered Silver Sixpence. Third & Fourth issues, initial
mark Rose, Spink 2561b. Old tickets here. 1565 as a date represents a frequency of 3.8%
for the 2,716 recorded single finds of Elizabeth 1st coins and 2.5% for all
5,588 recorded Elizabeth 1st hoard coins.
There was some impressive die life this year – only x5 dies are recorded
compared to way more for previous years.
Also, even though 64 was a huge year where they must have had many left
over dies, either partly used or reserve dies, there are no overdates for
1565. £175
WTH-7316:
1565 Elizabeth 1st
Hammered Silver Sixpence. Third and
fourth issue, initial mark Pheon, 1F bust variety – Spink 2561. Only five recorded dies. 1565 as a date represents a frequency of 3.8%
for the 2,716 recorded single finds of Elizabeth 1st coins and 2.5% for all
5,588 recorded Elizabeth 1st hoard coins.
£125
WTH-7832: 1565 Elizabeth 1st
Hammered Silver Sixpence. Initial mark Rose
(started late 1565: 1st October), third & fourth issue. Spink 2561. This date only ever occurs as a
straight 65 - they clearly had no functional dies left over from 1564 with which
they could adapt / recycle to make 1565 dies.
This is even more impressive when you learn that
virtually all 1564 coins were recycled from old 1562 dies! They had clearly got their act together after
the fiasco of 1562 when they had dies by the bucket full that went unused that
year. 1565 as a date represents a
frequency of 3.8% for the 2,716 recorded single finds of Elizabeth 1st coins
and 2.5% for all 5,588 recorded Elizabeth 1st hoard coins. It's a date you don't come across that often
these days. £235
WTH-7462: 1567 Elizabeth 1st Hammered
Silver Sixpence. Third & Fourth issues, initial
mark Coronet, Spink 2562. 1567 as a date
represents a frequency of 6.6% for the 2,716 recorded single finds of Elizabeth
1st coins and 4.8% for all 5,588 recorded Elizabeth 1st hoard coins. £235
WTH-7705:
1568 Elizabeth 1st
Hammered Silver Tudor Sixpence.
Third issue, initial mark Coronet, Spink 2562. Ex C. Martin 1981, ex Chris Comber
collection. 1568 as a date represents a
frequency of 4.6% for the 2,716 recorded single finds of Elizabeth 1st coins
and 5.1% for all 5,588 recorded Elizabeth 1st hoard coins. Outstanding grade. £285
WTH-7772:
1572 Elizabeth
1st Tudor Hammered Silver Sixpence.
Initial mark Ermine, bust 4B, third & fourth issues, Spink
2562. This is an example of the UNCORRECTED
die sinker’s error of the 2 in the date being both reversed and
inverted. Several recorded errors were
made on various Elizabethan dies but I think this is the most unforgivable
because even if you were illiterate, you’d surely notice an upside down,
reversed 2 and if you didn’t, then surely the quality control people would flag
it up?! And for it to then go into
production to not only strike coinage but for that coinage to then be deemed
correct and good enough for distribution into general circulation…???!!! It doesn’t seem possible but it certainly
happened. It obviously was quickly
discovered and corrected because coins exist that are normal 2 struck over this
inverted 2 die. Ex Arthur Fitts’
collection. £275
WTH-7464: 1573 Elizabeth 1st Hammered
Silver Sixpence. Third & Fourth issues, initial
mark Acorn, Spink 2563. 1573 as a date
represents a frequency of 4.6% for the 2,716 recorded single finds of Elizabeth
1st coins and 5.3% for all 5,588 recorded Elizabeth 1st hoard coins. £185
WTH-7706:
1576 Elizabeth 1st
Hammered Silver Tudor Sixpence.
Third issue, initial mark Eglantine, Spink 2563. 1576 as a date represents a frequency of 0.8%
for the 2,716 recorded single finds of Elizabeth 1st coins and 1.0% for all
5,588 recorded Elizabeth 1st hoard coins.
1576 is the
sixteenth rarest of all forty two dates. Strong reverse, especially date. £125
WTH-8117: 1576
Elizabeth 1st Hammered Silver Tudor Sixpence. Third issue, initial mark Eglantine, Spink
2563. 1576 as a date represents a
frequency of 0.8% for the 2,716 recorded single finds of Elizabeth 1st coins
and 1.0% for all 5,588 recorded Elizabeth 1st hoard coins. 1576 is the sixteenth rarest of all forty two dates. A very good grade coin with minor reverse
graffiti. £295
WTH-7599:
1577/6
Elizabeth 1st Hammered Silver Sixpence.
Initial mark Eglantine, third & fourth issues, Spink 2563. 1577 as a date represents a frequency of 0.4%
for the 2,716 recorded single finds of Elizabeth 1st coins and 0.4% for all
5,588 recorded Elizabeth 1st hoard coins.
1577 is the sixth
rarest of all forty two dates.
Whilst you can’t argue with the data, I would have placed 1577 at more
like 4th or 5th, but that’s clearly anecdotal. Interestingly, 1577, and to a lesser extent,
1576, are often thought of as common dates as they are both completely
surrounded by commoner dates on a graph of extant recorded examples. Interestingly, 1577 does not exist as a
straight 77 – they are all overstruck on old recycled 1576 dies. It is telling that very few 1577 sixpences
were actually struck as they were winding down the Fourth coinage: not only is
there a Fifth coinage 1578/7 variety (showing that they did actually produce a
straight 1577 but didn’t use it), but there is also a Fifth coinage 1578/7/6
variety showing that the 1577/6 was clearly only used sparingly in 1577 as it
was still viable in 1578, albeit with yet another alteration. A very rare coin. £425
WTH-7670:
1580 over 1579
Elizabeth 1st Hammered Silver Tudor Sixpence. Fifth coinage, bust 5A, initial mark Latin
Cross, Spink 2572. Overdates, with
altered initial marks, are found because too many dies were sunk in a year
where less coinage was struck that was originally expected, often down to
availability of bullion. These old dies
were effectively recycled up to three years later. It is interesting to note that although
changing the initial mark was obligatory, in line with the various pyx
inspections, the date was not required to be changed. They are actually quite rare in all coinages,
but specifically for the fifth coinage, it only really happened three
times. When you think that 79 to be
changed to 80 would have been twice the work, you begin to wonder why they
bothered changing the date at all. The
overdate on this coin is very clear. 1580
as a date represents a frequency of 3.7% for the 2,716 recorded single finds of
Elizabeth 1st coins and 4.1% for all 5,588 recorded Elizabeth 1st hoard coins. £225
WTH-7572: 1585 Elizabeth 1st Hammered
Silver Sixpence. Initial mark
Escallop, sixth issue. Only a single
1585 die recorded – two future overdates (1586/5 and 1587/6/5) are recorded
which were basically recycled dies from previous years, ie they made more 1585
dies than they actually used. 1585 as a
date represents a frequency of 1.4% for the 2,716 recorded single finds of
Elizabeth 1st coins and 2.1% for all 5,588 recorded Elizabeth 1st hoard
coins. 1585 is the twentieth rarest of all forty two dates. £145
WTH-9073:
1588 Elizabeth
1st Hammered Silver Tudor Sixpence. Sixth issue, initial mark Crescent, Spink
2578A. 1588 as a date represents a
frequency of 0.2% for the 2,716 recorded single finds of Elizabeth 1st coins
and 0.2% for all 5,588 recorded Elizabeth 1st hoard coins. 1588 is the fourth rarest of all forty two dates. The famous Spanish Armada date and although
only 4th rarest in the “league table”, this date is arguably the
most sought after of all dates. If you
check prices in previous (proper) coin auctions, you’ll see some very high
prices, especially in the States, and don’t forget there’s 30% buyer’s
commission on top of those prices.
Interestingly, this coin looks to have been a 15-- die where the final 8
has been added, presumably because this was a time of austerity where
relatively few coins were struck; the thought being that these dies could be
used over several years without the need to overdate. I have since bought a 1588 6d (WTH-7833) where both number 8s
look to have bee added to a 15-- die.
£485
WTH-8119: 1589 - final 9 over
sideways 9 Elizabeth 1st Hammered Silver Tudor Sixpence.
Sixth issue, initial mark Crescent, Spink 2578A. Note the two 9's are actually level with the
15 although both final digits were added to a finished 15-- die. In some instances, only the final digit was
added to a 158- die. This was a time of
austerity where relatively few coins were struck; the thought being that these
dies could be used over several years without the need to overdate. However, much more important is the final 9,
it being overstruck over a sideways 9 and further, that upright 9 was struck
over another upright 9. Messrs. Brown,
Comber & Wilkinson, the undisputed leading experts on all things
numismatically linked to Elizabeth 1st, in their research paper (published
2006, updated 2012), do record this sideways 9 but not the second upright
9. Interestingly, the same employee at
the mint who thought a sideways 9 was a good idea to add to a 15-- die was
probably the same one who in 1588 thought a sideways 8 was an equally good and
acceptable idea! 1580 also has an 8 over
a sideways 8. After 1589, no more errors
of this nature are recorded thus we can assume that he was either cured of his
sideways view on things or moved out! 1589
as a date represents a frequency of 0.5% for the 2,716 recorded single finds of
Elizabeth 1st coins and 0.5% for all 5,588 recorded Elizabeth 1st hoard
coins. 1589 is the eighth rarest of all forty two dates. Ex Chris Comber collection. £165
WTH-6713: 1589 Elizabeth 1st
Hammered Silver Sixpence. Initial
mark Crescent, sixth issue. Spink
2578A. 1589 as a date represents a
frequency of 0.5% for the 2,716 recorded single finds of Elizabeth 1st coins
and 0.5% for all 5,588 recorded Elizabeth 1st hoard coins. 1589 is the seventh
rarest of all forty two dates. £135
WTH-8121: High Grade 1590 Elizabeth 1st
Hammered Silver Tudor Sixpence. Sixth issue,
initial mark Hand, Spink 2578B. 1590 as
a date represents a frequency of 1.0% for the 2,716 recorded single finds of
Elizabeth 1st coins and 1.2% for all 5,588 recorded Elizabeth 1st hoard
coins. 1590 is the fourteenth rarest of all forty two dates. Outstanding grade for a coin so late in the
series. Ex Chris Comber collection. £465
WTH-7671:
1591 over 1590
Elizabeth 1st Hammered Silver Tudor Sixpence. Sixth coinage, bust 6C, initial mark Hand,
Spink 2578B. Overdates, with altered
initial marks, are found because too many dies were sunk in a year where less
coinage was struck that was originally expected, often down to availability of
bullion. These old dies were effectively
recycled up to three years later. It is
interesting to note that although changing the initial mark was obligatory, in
line with the various pyx inspections, the date was not required to be
changed. 1590 changed to 1591 is a
strange one in that most of the 1590 sixpences issued were made from 1589
recycled dies and the rest were from straight 1590 dies. They clearly didn’t issue many straight 1590
coins (it is a rarer year) because the dies were barely used – they took the
1591 dies, seeing they were still fresh, and altered them to produce 1591
coinage. 1591 as a date represents a
frequency of 1.2% for the 2,716 recorded single finds of Elizabeth 1st coins
and 1.2% for all 5,588 recorded Elizabeth 1st hoard coins. 1591 is the fifteenth rarest of all forty two
dates. £255
WTH-7092:
1592 Elizabeth
1st Hammered Silver Sixpence.
Initial mark Tun, sixth issue.
Spink 2578B. 1592 as a date represents a frequency of 2.5% for the 2,716
recorded single finds of Elizabeth 1st coins and 2.4% for all 5,588 recorded
Elizabeth 1st hoard coins. £95
WTH-7560:
1593 Elizabeth
1st Hammered Silver Sixpence. Sixth
issue, initial mark Tun, bust 6C, Spink 2578B.
Sometime cleaned. Ex A. Travis
collection. 1593 as a date represents a
frequency of 2.5% for the 2,716 recorded single finds of Elizabeth 1st coins
and 2.4% for all 5,588 recorded Elizabeth 1st hoard coins. Only x3 recorded straight 93 dies
recorded. These later dates are
invariably lower grade and problematic but this coin is much above
average. £275
WTH-7805:
1594 Elizabeth
1st Hammered Silver Tudor Sixpence
Sixth issue, initial mark Woolpack, which was in use
WTH-7319:
1596 Elizabeth 1st
Hammered Silver Sixpence. Sixth
issue, initial mark Key, Spink 2578B.
One of the rare years - 1596 as a date represents a frequency of 0.7%
for the 2,716 recorded single finds of Elizabeth 1st coins and 1.0% for all
5,588 recorded Elizabeth 1st hoard coins.
1596 is the
eleventh rarest of all forty two dates. A grand total of three recorded dies (one of
which is 9/6, another being bereft of any initial mark whatsoever) illustrates
just how rare a year this is. Unusually
for these rare later dates, this coin is actually very nice grade for
issue. £295
WTH-7806:
1596 Elizabeth
1st Hammered Silver Tudor Sixpence
Sixth issue, initial mark Key, which was in use
WTH-7709:
1597 Elizabeth
1st Hammered Silver Tudor Sixpence. Sixth issue, initial mark Key, Spink
2578B. 1597 as a date represents a
frequency of <0.04% for the 2,716 recorded single finds of Elizabeth 1st
coins and <0.03% for all 5,588 recorded Elizabeth 1st hoard coins. *** 1597 is the rarest of all forty two dates
*** I have only had one better through
my hands in many, many years. That was
the Walter Wilkinson coin which now forms the backbone of a very impressive,
growing collection and definitely not available. A great rarity, especially in this grade. £950
WTH-8122: 1597 Elizabeth 1st
Hammered Silver Tudor Sixpence. Sixth issue,
initial mark Key, Spink 2578B. Note the
97 digits are actually lower than they should be, indicating that both final
digits were added to a finished 15-- die.
1597 as a date represents a frequency of <0.04% for the 2,716
recorded single finds of Elizabeth 1st coins and <0.03% for all 5,588
recorded Elizabeth 1st hoard coins. *** 1597 is the rarest of all
forty two dates *** A
great rarity. £525
WTH-8031:
1599/8 Elizabeth
1st Hammered Silver Sixpence.
Initial mark a straight Anchor, Sixth issue, Spink 2578B. 1599 as a date represents a frequency of 0.2%
for the 2,716 recorded single finds of Elizabeth 1st coins and 0.1% for all
5,588 recorded Elizabeth 1st hoard coins.
*** 1599 is the
third rarest of all forty two dates *** There was an economic depression during the
final years of the sixteenth century, a factor hugely relevant in the rarity of
this coin. This led to a situation where
there was an oversupply of dies, resulting in date alterations (we see
1599/8/6, 99/8 [this coin] and 99/6).
This scenario only started in 1598 as prior to that date, we see very
little, if any overdating – even 1597 was a straight date. More interesting still, this coin is an unrecorded
1599 (large final 9) over 1599 (small final 9) over 1598. One die is recorded where BOTH the 9 and 8 of
the date were overstruck with a large 9 punch but this is just the final digit
and a smaller 9 is indicated in terms of the trailing tail. I have to say that this trailing tail may or
may not be a small 9 but even if it isn't, this is still unrecorded in that
only a single large 9 was used. Ex
Ewerby Hoard. Not a particularly
pleasing coin but nevertheless hugely interesting, very rare and benefiting
from coming from that well known, recent hoard – and by the way, this large
hoard was very much made up of worn coins from circulation with apparently zero
consideration given for any part of it to be “nice coins” – these were the
coins available to the individual who put that hoard together at that
time. This 1599/8 is fairly
representative across the board in terms of grade, showing us that the general
coinage in circulation in the 1640’s – the given date of this hoard – was
poor. It’s frustrating when people
demand high grade, choice sixpences and complain that all see are “battered,
low grade” examples. The Chris Comber
and Walter Wilkinson Elizabeth 1st collections had their fair share
of coins looking like this, even after many decades of collecting and
upgrading. A rare coin. £375
WTH-9074:
1600/159- Elizabeth 1st
Hammered Silver Sixpence. Sixth issue, initial mark 0, bust
6B - Spink 2578B. For the vast bulk of
Elizabethan coinage, little or no foresight had been used regarding dates and
initial marks, resulting in glaring overdates when the old dies were used again
(recycled) in subsequent years, for example the famous 1578/7/6. There are many others. The penny dropped at the mint, eventually,
that perhaps sinking dies but omitting initial marks and with only partial
dates (those to be added when the dies were brought into use), might be a good
idea. Amusingly, this practice was
adopted in, wait for it, 1599 - the most inappropriate time possible because
the following year was 1600 with three digits changing as opposed to usually
one and rarely two! Rather than throw
away the prepared 159- "future-proof" dies, they decided to alter the
middle two digits from -59- to -60-. The
first digit (thankfully!) didn't need changing and all they had to do was add
the 0 to the end of the date, as well as add the initial mark in the gap
provided. Thus we have 1600 over 159-
coins. Interestingly, these 159- dies
were also used in 1601 but even after adding the final digit and changing the
middle two, they discovered that the first and last digits were so far apart in
time that they were actually from different punches and so different! Demand for English coin was much in decline
at this period so these were tiny mintages: 1600 as a date represents a
frequency of 0.4% for the 2,716 recorded single finds of Elizabeth 1st coins
and 0.1% for all 5,588 recorded Elizabeth 1st hoard coins. 1600 is the fifth rarest of all forty two dates. I have to say that I don't see 1600 as being
as abundant as that, and I'm far from the only person saying that. A rare coin indeed. £475
WTH-7558:
1601 Elizabeth
1st Hammered Silver Sixpence.
Seventh issue, initial mark 1, Spink 2584. Toned.
Ex Ken Bressett collection, ex H. Mitchell ($140 twenty years ago). 1601 as a date represents a frequency of 0.6%
for the 2,716 recorded single finds of Elizabeth 1st coins and 0.7% for all
5,588 recorded Elizabeth 1st hoard coins.
1601 is the tenth
rarest of all forty two dates.
These later dates are invariably lower grade and problematic but this
coin certainly bucks that trend. £285
WTH-7174:
1602 Elizabeth
1st Hammered Silver Sixpence.
Seventh issue, initial mark 2 – the last ever date in the lengthy
Elizabeth 1st sixpence series.
Spink 2585. 1602 as a date
represents a frequency of 1.9% for the 2,716 recorded single finds of Elizabeth
1st coins and 2.1% for all 5,588 recorded Elizabeth 1st hoard coins. Sold with an auction printout as well as a
collector’s cabinet ticket. £125
Groats
WTH-6798: Elizabeth 1st
Hammered Silver Groat. Initial mark Lis, rarer first issue. Spink 2551A.
These bust 1G first issue hammered groats were only struck for a very
few months – Spring 1560 to
WTH-6723: Elizabeth 1st
Hammered Silver Groat. Initial mark Lis, rarer first issue. Spink 2551A.
These bust 1G first issue hammered groats were only struck for a very
few months – Spring 1560 to
WTH-6572: Elizabeth 1st
Hammered Silver Groat. Initial mark Martlet,
bust 1F, second issue, Spink 2556. Second
issue Martlet hammered groats were only struck for a
total of 10 months (9th December 1560 to 24th October 1561) –
interestingly, the Martlets and Cross Crosslets were the last hammered groats
issued under her reign, even though Elizabeth reigned for a further 40+
years. £255
WTH-7904:
Elizabeth 1st
Early Hammered Silver Groat or Fourpence.
Initial
mark Martlet, bust 1F, second issue, Spink 2556. Second issue Martlet hammered groats were only
struck for a total of 10 months (9th December 1560 to 24th October
1561) – interestingly, the Martlets and Cross Crosslets were the last hammered
groats issued under her reign, even though Elizabeth reigned for a further 40+
years. This is a beautiful coin, being
excellent grade, centrally struck, attractively toned, etc etc. £475
Threepences
WTH-7300:
1561 Elizabeth 1st Rare
Large Flan Hammered Silver Threepence.
Third and Fourth Issues of 1561-77, rose behind Queen, reverse
dated. Large 15mm flan (in fact,
this one is nearer to 16mm), Spink 2564.
Creased and straightened, with some resultant cracking, as so many of
these newly introduced issues were – the public were still on hightened alert
for fakes after the numismatic escapades of Elizabeth’s father, Henry VIII, and
her bother, Edward VI, although to be fair, the early issues of Edward VI,
extremely debased as they were, had very little to do with the Edward. It is unusual to see dated threepences for
the 1560’s but they obviously do exist.
1561 was something of a prolific year for threepences BUT, this very
first issue of 1561, in fact the very first Elizabeth 1st threepence
issued), with it’s large flan, is represented by a single die only. Brown, Comber & Wilkinson postulate that
this large flan threepence was a two month trial period of experimentation. The start date of production was
WTH-6904: 1561 Elizabeth 1st
Hammered Silver Tudor Dated Threepence.
Third & fourth issues, Spink 2565.
Initial mark pheon – only in use from
WTH-7608:
156Z/1
Elizabeth 1st Hammered Silver Threepence.
Third & fourth issues, initial mark Pheon, Spink 2565. An interesting die. You might be thinking this was an error (a Z
for a 2) but you’d be wrong. 1561 was a
huge year for sixpence output as well as threepences, but not on the same
scale. Like the sixpences, some of the
61 dies that hadn’t broken were recycled, along with the unused 1561 “reserve”
dies. They decided a Z made a better
number 2 – there were no 1562/1 threepences and indeed, there was even a
straight 156Z issued when they’d recycled all the old 1561 dies. It was midway through 1562 that the decision
was taken to change the Z for a proper 2.
This Z for 2 was actually nothing new as the earlier Edward VI crowns
also used a Z for a 2. Sold with an old
ticket that (incorrectly) states 156Z/2.
A nice grade coin. £135
WTH-7312:
1563 over 2
Elizabeth 1st Hammered Silver Threepence. Third & fourth issues, initial mark
Pheon, Spink 2565. Just like the
sixpence, 1563 is one of the rarest dates in the entire series. There are only x2 dies recorded by Brown,
Comber & Wilkinson (2006) for 1563 and further, only one of those is this
overdate. Ex Dupree (a well respected
collection) and ex Capozollo. A rare
coin. £245
WTH-6791: 1564 Elizabeth 1st
Hammered Silver Threepence. Initial mark Pheon / Broad
Arrow. Third and fourth issues, Spink
2565. A rarer date. £95
WTH-7287:
1566 Rare Date
Elizabeth 1st Hammered Silver Tudor Threepence. Initial mark Portcullis. Third and fourth issues, smaller flan,
regular bust, Spink 2565. Not so rare in
sixpences but when you consider that there were only TWO 1566 threepence dies
in use, with NO overdates (2006 data), it’s rare in threepences. A general rule of thumb you may wish to note
is that 1560’s Elizabeth 1st coins, bar sixpences, are rarer. This date is an extremely rare year. Excellent grade - much better in the hand
than the images suggest, hence the extra cheap camera phone image I’ve included. £265
WTH-5797: 1567 Elizabeth 1st
Hammered Silver Threepence. Initial mark Coronet. A rarer pre 1570’s date. Spink 2566.
£155
WTH-7418: 1568 Elizabeth 1st Hammered
Silver Threepence in Higher Grade.
Third and fourth issues (although Wilkinson, Comber & Brown go
further by designated this as Third Coinage only), initial mark Coronet. Spink 2566.
I’ve been asked several times about the odd looking 8 in 1568 coinage. It looks for all it’s worth to be an 8 over
7, but in fact they are all straight 68 dates unless you can see
the ghosting of the angled diagonal of the 7 under the 8. The die sinkers simply gave the 8 a flat
top. This coin benefits from yet another
unusual feather in that the bottom circle of the 8 is broken! There is a rarer variety where the flat top
of the 8 is on the bottom, ie an inverted 8 but interestingly, this coin is
actually rarer than the inverted 8 3d types!
1568 threepences utilised only three dies – 68/7 (the 8 being inverted),
68 (the 8 being inverted), and a 1568 with “normal” flat topped 8, meaning the
flat topped 8 1568 threepence is rarer by 2:1.
An interesting coin and much, much better grade than normally seen. £225
WTH-7088:
1570 Elizabeth
1st Hammered Silver Threepence.
Initial mark Castle, third and fourth issues, Spink 2566. Ex Eccles
collection. £95
WTH-7377: 1571 Elizabeth 1st Hammered
Silver Threepence. Third and fourth
issues, initial mark Castle. Spink
2566. A very pleasing example. £185
WTH-7417: 1572 (2 over inverted 2)
Elizabeth 1st Hammered Silver Threepence.
Third and fourth issues (although Wilkinson, Comber & Brown go
further by designated this as Third Coinage only), initial mark Ermine. Spink 2566.
A really interesting die sinker’s error where the final 2 of the date
was originally inverted or upside down.
Quality control picked up on this (ie someone happened to notice it!)
and so rather than start a new die from scratch, they simply put a correctly
orientated 2 over the top of the error.
This is a single die (you’ll be pleased to hear the mistake was not
repeated!) and can be chronologically attributed to the very first issue of
1572, ie 19th April onwards.
£185
WTH-6669: 1573 Elizabeth 1st
Hammered Silver Threepence. Initial mark Acorn. Third and fourth issues, Spink 2566. Acorn was only used for 6 months in total (
WTH-6649: 1574 Elizabeth 1st
Hammered Silver Threepence. Initial mark Eglantine. Third and fourth issues, Spink 2566. Very nice grade. £139
WTH-7301:
1575/4 Elizabeth 1st Hammered
Silver Threepence. Third and fourth
issue, initial mark Eglantine, ear showing.
Spink 2566. A very nice grade
coin but perhaps of more interest is the overdate: 1575/4. Brown, Comber & Wilkinson published that
only a single recorded 75/4 die was known in 2006. In the intervening years, more examples have
been unearthed resulting in x3 dies now being known and a miniscule 9 recorded
examples of this overdate only. For
those interested, Eglantine spanned 29th May 1574 to 13th
July 1578 so it is clear to see what happened – as the year turned to 1575, the
74 Eglantine dies were still good enough to use, thus initial mark Eglantine was
able to remain and a simple date adjustment to the die (although if that’s all
they had to do, you have to question the skill of the die sinker based on the
result!) sufficed. £175
WTH-7249:
1575 Elizabeth
1st Hammered Silver Threepence.
Initial mark Eglantine, third & fourth issues, regular bust, Spink
2566. This particular initial mark was
relatively long-lived, being introduced
WTH-7389:
1576/5 Elizabeth
1st Hammered Silver Tudor Threepence. Initial mark
Eglantine, third & fourth issues.
Spink 2566. A rarer year with
only one straight 76 die and this modified 76 over 75 die according to Brown,
Comber & Wilkinson. £165
WTH-7378: 1579 Elizabeth 1st Hammered
Silver Threepence. Fifth issue,
initial mark Greek Cross. Spink
2573. Just the single die pairing being
recorded by Comber, Wilkinson & Brown, although there was another pair
prepared which were not used in 1579 but were overdated and used in 1580. This coin is not far off being as struck,
although the obverse strike quality could have been better. £195
Halfgroats
WTH-7573:
1560-61 Elizabeth
1st Hammered Silver Halfgroat.
Initial mark Martlet, second issue, Spink 2557. Collectors will be aware that of all the
smaller denominations, the halfgroats suffered most in terms of clipping, wear
and sometimes the quality of actual coinage leaving the mint. Finding a really nice halfgroat is virtually
impossible whereas pennies, and even the fractions, are relatively
abundant. Sold with collector’s cabinet
ticket together with an information printout.
£155
WTH-7313:
1584-86
Elizabeth 1st Hammered Silver Halfgroat. Sixth issue, initial mark Escallop, Spink
2579. Collectors will be aware that of
all the smaller denominations, the halfgroats suffered most in terms of
clipping, wear and sometimes the quality of actual coinage leaving the
mint. Finding a really nice halfgroat is
virtually impossible whereas pennies, and even the fractions, are relatively
abundant. £175
WTH-6704: Elizabeth 1st
Hammered Silver Halfgroat. Initial
mark 1, penultimate coinage of the seventh issue,
WTH-7488: 1601 Elizabeth 1st Hammered
Silver Halfgroat. Seventh issue, initial mark 1. Spink 2586.
Nice grade and sold with a detailed annotated coin envelope. £125
WTH-7646:
Elizabeth 1st
Tudor Hammered Silver Halfgroat. Seventh and final issue with initial mark 1 so
1601. Further image here.
WTH-8029: 1560-61 Elizabeth 1st Hammered
Silver Halfgroat. Initial mark
Martlet, second issue, Spink 2557.
Collectors will be aware that of all the smaller denominations, the
halfgroats suffered most in terms of clipping, wear and sometimes the quality
of actual coinage leaving the mint.
Finding a really nice halfgroat is virtually impossible whereas pennies,
and even the fractions, are relatively abundant. A really nice example that evaded the best
efforts of the Tudor and Stuart clippers!
£185
Three Halfpence
WTH-6970: 1561 Elizabeth 1st
Hammered Silver Three Halfpence. Initial mark Pheon –Spink 2569. 1561, although third and fourth issue, is the
very first date ever for this rarer denomination. £135
WTH-6643: 1573 Elizabeth 1st
Hammered Silver Three Halfpence – a very rare x2 month only issue. Initial mark Acorn – commenced operation on
WTH-6825: 1575 Elizabeth 1st
Hammered Silver Three Halfpence.
Initial mark eglantine. Spink
2569. A relatively high grade example of
a dated, less common denomination Elizabeth 1st silver coin. Reported to be part of an old hoard – I only
managed to buy a couple of the coins, the other being a 1561 three halfpence
which is now sold. £185
Pennies
WTH-7360:
Elizabeth 1st
Hammered Silver Penny. Third &
fourth issue, initial mark Crescent, 1587-89.
Spink 2580. Ex Dr E. Burstall
collection. £69
Three Farthings
WTH-7332:
1561 Elizabeth 1st
Hammered Silver Three Farthings. The
three farthings – a bizarre dated fractional denomination – started in 1561 and
ended in 1582 (with just x15 dates used), never to see the numismatic light of
day again. Interestingly, the
Elizabethan public would not have been as flabbergasted at the introduction of
this odd coin as perhaps we are: Irish base coinage was circulating at this
time in England at 25% face value and the earlier English base issue
halfgroats were officially reduced in September 1560 as, wait for it… three
farthings. The public of the day were
well aware of this required fractional calculation. Only three different dies recorded for this
date. Initial mark Pheon, which didn’t
even start production until the end of the year in
WTH-7432: 1562 Elizabeth I Hammered
Silver Three Farthings. Initial mark
pheon, third and fourth coinage. Spink
2571. A very rare date for this
denomination as for the straight 2, there was only the single die in use at the tail end of the year (prior
to this they were using recycled 1561 dies, ie 1562/1). It got so little usage in 1562 that in was
recycled in 1564 (there was no issue of this denomination in 1563) as a 1564/2. The three farthings wasn’t even worth a penny and yet they went to a great
deal of effort to create the dies for this unlikely fractional unit,
incorporating a date and really working on sinking dies on an almost
microscopic level, especially when you consider they only had daylight or
candlelight and with little of today’s magnification techniques. Die sinkers in particular often lost their
eyesight in later life, and of course, “later life” in Tudor times was probably
around 40 or younger! The three farthings – a bizarre dated fractional
denomination – started in 1561 and ended in 1582 (with just x15 dates used),
never to see the numismatic light of day again.
Interestingly, the Elizabethan public would not have been as
flabbergasted at the introduction of this odd coin as perhaps we are: Irish
base coinage was circulating at this time in England at 25% face value and
the earlier English base issue halfgroats were officially reduced in September
1560 as, wait for it… three farthings.
The public of the day were well aware of this required fractional
calculation. An iconic denomination,
unique to Elizabeth 1st, £265
WTH-7434: 1575 over 5 Elizabeth 1st
Hammered Silver Three Farthings.
Initial mark eglantine, third and fourth coinage. Spink 2571. Rare over-date, completely unrecorded by
Comber, Wilkinson. 1575 was a single die
year with the same die in use in the following year as a modified / recycled
1576/5, thus showing that very few 1575 three halfpence were struck, and a
further two 1575 dies, which were prepared but never used in that year, used in
1578 (1578/5), 1579 (1579/5) and 1581 (1581/75). The three farthings wasn’t
even worth a penny and yet they went to a great deal of effort to create the
dies for this unlikely fractional unit, incorporating a date and really working
on sinking dies on an almost microscopic level, especially when you consider
they only had daylight or candlelight and with little of today’s magnification
techniques. Die sinkers in particular
often lost their eyesight in later life, and of course, “later life” in Tudor
times was probably around 40 or younger!
The three farthings – a bizarre dated
fractional denomination – started in 1561 and ended in 1582 (with just x15
dates used), never to see the numismatic light of day again. Interestingly, the Elizabethan public would
not have been as flabbergasted at the introduction of this odd coin as perhaps
we are: Irish base coinage was circulating at this time in England at 25% face
value and the earlier English base issue halfgroats were officially
reduced in September 1560 as, wait for it… three farthings. The public of the day were well aware of this
required fractional calculation. An
iconic denomination, unique to Elizabeth 1st. £295
Halfpennies
WTH-7497: 1587-89 Elizabeth 1st
Milled Silver Halfpenny. Sixth issue, initial mark
Crescent. Spink 2581. Ex David Rogers’ collection. I had a similar coin from the famous Chris
Comber collection and on his ticket, he had Crescent down as a “Rare
Mark”. For those collectors interested
in marrying up coins with historical events, 1588 is the date of the Spanish
Armada. £145
WTH-7913:
1602 Elizabeth 1st
Hammered Silver Portcullis Halfpenny.
Initial mark 2, seventh issue, Spink 2588.
It is interesting to note that the halfpenny was a late addition to the varied
Elizabethan portfolio of denominations, being introduced post 1582 in the sixth
coinage. Only a single pair of dies was
used throughout the reign, and indeed the same die pair was used very early on
under James 1st. During 1601, the
obverse die became damaged and was repaired.
All subsequent coins show the repair (left hand side of the portcullis -
no bolt connecting the third horizontal bar to the second vertical bar),
including the James 1st issue. This coin
has no such repair and so is one of those very interesting contemporary
counterfeits. These are superbly
done but to be fair, it was the easiest coin to copy. Ex Chris Comber
collection. What a coin! £195
WTH-7951:
Elizabeth 1st
Hammered Silver Portcullis Halfpenny.
Sixth issue, Tower (
WTH-8114: Elizabeth 1st Tudor
Hammered Silver Portcullis Halfpenny. Initial mark Key, sixth issue, 1595-8, Tower mint, Spink 2581. A tiny coin but not the tiniest - that honour
goes to a farthing issued by
“Other”
WTH-7390:
Elizabeth 1st
Queen Under Canopy Copper Jetton or Medalet. Struck under the reign of King James 1st,
1610-15, by Hans
Krauwinkel at